Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
Open Access
- 11 May 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-76
Abstract
Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the existing research on differences in primary care utilization between immigrant groups and the majority population. For this review PubMed, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Sociofile, Web of Science and Current Contents were consulted. Study selection and quality assessment was performed using a predefined protocol by 2 reviewers independently of each other. Only original, quantitative, peer-reviewed papers were taken into account. To account for this hierarchical structure, logistic multilevel analyses were performed to examine the extent to which differences are found across countries and immigrant groups. Differences in primary care use were related to study characteristics, strength of the primary care system and methodological quality. A total of 37 studies from 7 countries met all inclusion criteria. Remarkably, studies performed within the US more often reported a significant lower use among immigrant groups as compared to the majority population than the other countries. As studies scored higher on methodological quality, the likelihood of reporting significant differences increased. Adjustment for health status and use of culture-/language-adjusted procedures during the data collection were negatively related to reporting significant differences in the studies. Our review underlined the need for careful design in studies of differences in health care use between immigrant groups and the majority population. The results from studies concerning differences between immigrant and the majority population in primary health care use performed within the US might be interpreted as a reflection of a weaker primary care system in the US compared to Europe and Canada.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health StatusThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2004
- Self reports in research with non-English speakersBMJ, 2003
- The Contribution of Primary Care Systems to Health Outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Countries, 1970–1998Health Services Research, 2003
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to and Use of Health Care Services, 1977 to 1996Medical Care Research and Review, 2000
- Equity and the Ethnic Patterning of GP Services in BritainSocial Policy & Administration, 1998
- Reported health, lifestyles, and use of health care of first generation immigrants in The Netherlands: do socioeconomic factors explain their adverse position?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- Ethnicity, equity and the use of health services in the British NHSSocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- Migration, acculturation and utilization of primary health careSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- Inner-city residents, ethnic minorities and primary health carePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1983
- Visits to Physicians by Asian/Pacific AmericansMedical Care, 1982