Safety and Necessity of Including the Middle Hepatic Vein in the Right Lobe Graft in Adult-to-Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 238 (1) , 137-148
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000077921.38307.16
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the safety of donors who have donated the middle hepatic vein in right lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to determine whether such inclusion is necessary for optimum graft function. Summary Background Data The necessity to include the middle hepatic vein in a right lobe graft in adult-to-adult LDLT is controversial. Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in the graft provides uniform hepatic venous drainage but may lead to congestion of segment IV in the donor. Methods From 1996 to 2002, 93 right-lobe LDLTs were performed. All right-lobe grafts except 1 contained the middle hepatic vein. In the donor operation, attention was paid to preserve the segment IV hepatic artery and to avoid prolonged rotation of the right lobe. The middle hepatic vein was transected proximal to a major segment IVb hepatic vein whereas possible to preserve the venous drainage in the liver remnant. Results There was no donor death. Two donors had intraoperative complications (accidental left hepatic vein occlusion and portal vein thrombosis) and were well after immediate rectification. Twenty-four donors (26%) had postoperative complications, mostly minor wound infection. The postoperative international normalized ratio on day 1 was better in the donors with preservation of segment IVb hepatic vein than those without the preservation, but, in all donors, the liver function was largely normal by postoperative day 7. The first recipient had severe graft congestion as the middle hepatic vein was not reconstructed before reperfusion. In 7 other recipients, the middle hepatic vein was found occluded intraoperatively owing to technical errors. The postoperative hepatic and renal function of the recipients with an occluded or absent middle hepatic vein was worse than those with a patent middle hepatic vein. The hospital mortality rate was also higher in those with an occluded middle hepatic vein (3/9 vs. 5/84, P = 0.028). Conclusions Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in right-lobe LDLT is safe and is essential for optimum graft function and patient survival.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biliary Reconstruction and Complications of Right Lobe Live Donor Liver TransplantationAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Right-lobe live donor liver transplantation improves survival of patients with acute liver failureBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipientsLiver Transplantation, 2002
- Donor safety in living related liver transplantation: Underestimation of the risks for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolismLiver Transplantation, 2002
- Functional venous anatomy for right-lobe grafting and techniques to optimize outflowLiver Transplantation, 2001
- Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right-lobe grafts: Results and lessons learned from a single-center experienceLiver Transplantation, 2001
- Accuracy and utility of 3-dimensional computed tomography in evaluating donors for adult living related liver transplantsLiver Transplantation, 2001
- Technical challenges of hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2001
- Anatomical keys and pitfalls in living donor liver transplantationJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2000
- Single-center analysis of the first 40 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants using the right lobeLiver Transplantation, 2000