Three‐stage contingent screening for Down syndrome
- 24 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 26 (6) , 528-534
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1451
Abstract
Objective To demonstrate the potential value of three‐stage sequential screening for Down syndrome. Methods Protocols were considered in which maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) and free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurements were taken on all women in the first trimester. Those women with very low Down syndrome risks were screened negative at that stage and nuchal translucency (NT) was measured on the remainder and the risk reassessed. Those with very low risk were then screened negative and those with very high risk were offered early diagnostic testing. Those with intermediate risks received second‐trimester maternal serum α‐fetoprotein, free β‐hCG, unconjugated estriol and inhibin‐A. Risk was then reassessed and those with high risk were offered diagnosis. Detection rates and false‐positive rates were estimated by multivariate Gaussian modelling using Monte‐Carlo simulation. Results The modelling suggests that, with full adherence to a three‐stage policy, overall detection rates of nearly 90% and false‐positive rates below 2.0% can be achieved. Approximately two‐thirds of pregnancies are screened on the basis of first‐trimester biochemistry alone, five out of six women complete their screening in the first trimester, and the first‐trimester detection rate is over 60%. Conclusion Three‐stage contingent sequential screening is potentially highly effective for Down syndrome screening. The acceptability of this protocol and its performance in practice, should be tested in prospective studies. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which contingent sequential screening protocol?Prenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Predicting the result of additional second-trimester markers from a woman's first-trimester marker profile: a new concept in Down syndrome screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Practical strategies in contingent sequential screening for Down syndromePrenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Which contingent sequential screening protocol?Prenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Contingent screening for Down syndrome is an efficient alternative to non‐disclosure sequential screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2004
- Nuchal translucency and gestational agePrenatal Diagnosis, 2004
- A model for disclosing the first trimester part of an integrated Down's syndrome screening testClinical Genetics, 2004
- Executive summaryJournal of Medical Screening, 2003
- An increase in cost‐effectiveness of first trimester maternal screening programmes for fetal chromosome anomalies is obtained by contingent testingPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second TrimestersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999