Forward masking: Adaptation or integration?
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 109 (2) , 732-741
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1336501
Abstract
The aim of this study was to attempt to distinguish between neural adaptation and persistence (or temporal integration) as possible explanations of forward masking. Thresholds were measured for a sinusoidal signal as a function of signal duration for conditions where the delay between the masker offset and the signal offset (the offset-offset interval) was fixed. The masker was a 200-ms broadband noise, presented at a spectrum level of 40 dB (re: 20 microPa), and the signal was a 4-kHz sinusoid, gated with 2-ms ramps. The offset-offset interval was fixed at various durations between 4 and 102 ms and signal thresholds were measured for a range of signal durations at each interval. A substantial decrease in thresholds was observed with increasing duration for signal durations up to about 20 ms. At short offset-offset intervals, the amount of temporal integration exceeded that normally found in quiet. The results were simulated using models of temporal integration (the temporal-window model) and adaptation. For both models, the inclusion of a peripheral nonlinearity, similar to that observed physiologically in studies of the basilar membrane, was essential in producing a good fit to the data. Both models were about equally successful in accounting for the present data. However, the temporal-window model provided a somewhat better account of similar data from a simultaneous-masking experiment, using the same parameters. This suggests that the linear, time-invariant properties of the temporal-window approach are appropriate for modeling forward masking. Overall the results confirm that forward masking can be described in terms of peripheral nonlinearity followed by linear temporal integration at higher levels in the auditory system. However, the difference in predictions between the adaptation and integration models is relatively small, meaning that influence of adaptation cannot be ruled out.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Some observations on simultaneous and nonsimultaneous maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980
- A power law transformation resulting in a class of short-term integrators that produce time-intensity trades for noise burstsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- PSM studies II. Post-stimulatory masked thresholds as a function of probe tone durationJournal of Sound and Vibration, 1972
- Backward and Forward MaskingInternational Journal of Audiology, 1971
- Temporal Effects in Simultaneous Masking by White-Noise BurstsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965
- Rate of Decay of Auditory SensationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964
- The Decay of Sensation and the Remainder of Adaptation after Short Pure-Tone Impulses on the EarActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1947