Barriers to Control of Blood Glucose in Diabetes Mellitus
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Medical Quality
- Vol. 15 (1) , 16-25
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106286060001500104
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to characterize the barriers to tight control of diabetes mellitus. The study collected data from multiple sources at a primary health care clinic in an academic teaching hospital serving an urban population, including patients' charts, structured interviews with patients, a survey of physicians' general perspectives and beliefs concerning diabetes mellitus, and a physician's structured review of barriers to tight control for individual patients. One hundred thirty-five patients with scheduled appointments were eligible for the study, of whom 94% had had a recent hemoglobin A1C (HbAC). Seventy-seven of 88 patients (88%) who presented for their appointments consented to the interview, 48 of 50 providers (96%) returned useable surveys, and providers completed individual assessments for 96 patients (71%). Patients had a mean age of 61 years, an average of 7.60 diagnoses, and an average of 8.96 prescriptions. Their diabetes control was less than ideal, with less than 15% having normal or near normal control and almost a quarter having poor control. Correlations of HbAjC with age and show rate were seen. Physicians' assessments showed that motivation and understanding of diabetes and compliance with diet and medications correlated with diabetes control. Neither patient knowledge nor physician knowledge appeared to be a problem, nor did either correlate with diabetes control. The number of barriers to control were many, with over half of the patients having five or more barriers. Tight control of blood glucose is felt to be an important aspect of quality care for diabetic patients. In this study, a representative sample of diabetic patients had less than ideal diabetes control. This population was receiving their care in an urban setting and had many comorbid illnesses and many barriers to control. Age, motivation, understanding of the disease, show rate, and compliance with diet and medications had statistical correlations with diabetes control. In order to improve the quality of care for diabetic patients, barriers to care must be addressed.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient literacyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Health literacy and the risk of hospital admissionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Controlling Type 2 Diabetes Are the Benefits Worth the Costs?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Screening, prevention, counseling, and treatment for the complications of type II diabetes mellitusJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1997
- The Role of Patient Participation in the Doctor Visit: Implications for adherence to diabetes careDiabetes Care, 1996
- Diabetes in urban african americans. III. Management of type II diabetes in a municipal hospital settingThe American Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Why should patients do what we ask them to do?Patient Education and Counseling, 1995
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Effect of Long-Term Monitoring of Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990