Influence of age on the relation between heart rate variability, left ventricular ejection fraction, frequency of ventricular extrasystoles, and sudden death after myocardial infarction.
Open Access
- 1 May 1992
- Vol. 67 (5) , 387-391
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.67.5.387
Abstract
AIMS--To examine the influence of age on the prediction of sudden death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate variability (HRv), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles. BACKGROUND--Autonomic and left ventricular function and the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles change with age but the influence of age on the prediction of sudden death from these variables has not been examined. METHODS--The 477 patients who had been through an early postinfarction risk stratification protocol and followed up for a mean of 790 days were dichotomised at 60 years of age. RESULTS--Sudden deaths occurred with similar frequency in both age groups (12 (4.7%) of the 256 patients aged < 60 years and seven (3.2%) of the 221 older patients). Sudden death, however, accounted for 52% of all deaths in the young group but only 18.4% of all deaths in the older group (p < 0.01). An HRv index of < 20 units combined with an average of more than 10 ventricular extrasystoles an hour on Holter monitoring (VE10) had a sensitivity of 50%, a positive predictive accuracy of 33%, and a risk ratio of 18 in the young group (p < 0.001) but was not significantly predictive in older patients. The situation was similar when the combination of an LVEF < 40% with VE10 was considered. This combination had a sensitivity of 44%, positive predictive accuracy of 36.4%, and a risk ratio of 16.1 in young patients (p < 0.001), but was not significantly predictive in older patients. The combination of VE10 with either LVEF < 40% or HRv < 20 units gave a sensitivity of 75%, positive predictive accuracy of 30%, and a risk ratio of 30 in young patients (p < 0.001), but the relation between this combination and sudden death in older patients was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION--In postinfarction patients aged < 60 sudden death was a more predominant mode of death and was more reliably predicted from a depressed HRv index, an LVEF < 40%, and VE10 than in older postinfarction patients. These findings may have important implications for post-infarction risk stratification and management.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classification of deaths after myocardial infarction as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic (The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Factors leading to shorter survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients ages 65 to 75 years compared with younger patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1984
- Long-term prognosis after recovery from myocardial infarction: a nine year follow-up of the Perth Coronary Register.Circulation, 1983
- Timolol-related reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients ages 65-75 years surviving acute myocardial infarction. Prepared for the Norwegian Multicentre Study Group.Circulation, 1982
- Premature ventricular complexes in the absence of identifiable heart disease.Circulation, 1981
- Effect of Age on the Response of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to ExerciseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population.Circulation, 1977
- The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in manAmerican Heart Journal, 1968