A Comment on Nomenclature in Faunal Studies
- 20 January 1981
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 46 (1) , 192-194
- https://doi.org/10.2307/280000
Abstract
The study of faunal remains from archaeological sites has been described using a variety of terms including: zooarchaeology, archaeozoology, osteoarchaeology, and ethnozoology. With such a broad spectrum of terms in current usage, we feel that the contradictions and errors inherent in some of this nomenclature need to be corrected. We prefer the term zooarchaeology, as a contraction of the word zoologico-archaeology proposed by Lubbock in 1865, to define the study of animal remains from archaeological sites and their relationship to humans.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spinal arthritis (spondylosis deformans) in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes, with some methodology of relevance to zooarchaeologyJournal of Archaeological Science, 1977
- Animal bone finds and economic archaeology: A critical study of ‘osteo‐archaeological’ methodWorld Archaeology, 1973
- An elephant butchery site at Mwanganda's Village, Karonga, Malawi, and its relevance for Palaeolithic archaeologyWorld Archaeology, 1970
- Archaeozoological Evidence of the Spotted Skunk in IllinoisJournal of Mammalogy, 1957