LINKING OCCURRENCE AND FITNESS TO PERSISTENCE: HABITAT-BASED APPROACH FOR ENDANGERED GREATER SAGE-GROUSE
Open Access
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Applications
- Vol. 17 (2) , 508-526
- https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1871
Abstract
Detailed empirical models predicting both species occurrence and fitness across a landscape are necessary to understand processes related to population persistence. Failure to consider both occurrence and fitness may result in incorrect assessments of habitat importance leading to inappropriate management strategies. We took a two‐stage approach to identifying critical nesting and brood‐rearing habitat for the endangered Greater Sage‐Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in Alberta at a landscape scale. First, we used logistic regression to develop spatial models predicting the relative probability of use (occurrence) for Sage‐Grouse nests and broods. Secondly, we used Cox proportional hazards survival models to identify the most risky habitats across the landscape. We combined these two approaches to identify Sage‐Grouse habitats that pose minimal risk of failure (source habitats) and attractive sink habitats that pose increased risk (ecological traps). Our models showed that Sage‐Grouse select for heterogeneous patches of moderate sagebrush cover (quadratic relationship) and avoid anthropogenic edge habitat for nesting. Nests were more successful in heterogeneous habitats, but nest success was independent of anthropogenic features. Similarly, broods selected heterogeneous high‐productivity habitats with sagebrush while avoiding human developments, cultivated cropland, and high densities of oil wells. Chick mortalities tended to occur in proximity to oil and gas developments and along riparian habitats. For nests and broods, respectively, approximately 10% and 5% of the study area was considered source habitat, whereas 19% and 15% of habitat was attractive sink habitat. Limited source habitats appear to be the main reason for poor nest success (39%) and low chick survival (12%). Our habitat models identify areas of protection priority and areas that require immediate management attention to enhance recruitment to secure the viability of this population. This novel approach to habitat‐based population viability modeling has merit for many species of concern.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Range plant communities and range health assessment guidelines for the dry mixedgrass natural subregion of Alberta : first approximation /Published by Smithsonian Institution ,2005
- When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal PopulationsConservation Biology, 2004
- Avian habitat evaluation: should counting birds count?Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2004
- Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic LandscapeConservation Biology, 2004
- Adaptive management of prairie grouse: how do we get there?Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2004
- Sage-Grouse Nesting and Brood Habitat Use in Southern CanadaThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2002
- NESTING AND REPRODUCTIVE ACTIVITIES OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE IN A DECLINING NORTHERN FRINGE POPULATIONOrnithological Applications, 2001
- Corvid Density and Nest Predation in Relation to Forest Fragmentation: A Landscape PerspectiveEcology, 1992
- Elevated Predation Rates as an Edge Effect in Habitat Islands: Experimental EvidenceEcology, 1988
- Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample StudyThe Annals of Statistics, 1982