Elaborated Reichardt detectors
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Vol. 2 (2) , 300-321
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.000300
Abstract
The elaborated Reichardt detector (ERD) proposed by van Santen and Sperling [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 451 ( 1984)], based on Reichardt’s motion detector [ Z. Naturforsch. Teil B 12, 447 ( 1957)], is an opponent system of two mirror-image subunits. Each subunit receives inputs from two spatiotemporal filters (receptive fields), multiplies the filter outputs, and temporally integrates the product. Subunit outputs are algebraically subtracted to yield ERD output. ERD’s can correctly indicate direction of motion of drifting sine waves of any spatial and temporal frequency. Here we prove that with a careful choice of either temporal or spatial filters, the subunits can themselves become quite similar or equivalent to the whole ERD; with suitably chosen filters, the ERD is equivalent to an elaborated version of a motion detector proposed by Watson and Ahumada [NASA Tech. Memo. 84352 (1983)]; and for every choice of filters, the ERD is fully equivalent to the detector proposed by Adelson and Bergen [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284– 299 ( 1985)]. Some equivalences between the motion detection (in x, t) by ERD’s and spatial pattern detection (in x, y) are demonstrated. The responses of the ERD and its variants to drifting sinusoidal gratings, to other sinusoidally modulated stimuli (on–off gratings, counterphase flicker), and to combinations of sinusoids are derived and compared with data. ERD responses to two-frame motion displays are derived, and several new experimental predictions are tested experimentally. It is demonstrated that a system containing ERD’s of various sizes can solve the correspondence problem in two-frame motion of random-bar stimuli and shows the predicted phase dependencies when confronted with displays composed of triple sinusoids combined either in amplitude modulation phase or in quasi-frequency modulation phase. Finally, it is shown that, while the ERD may in some instances give larger responses to nonrigid than to rigid displacements, the subunits (and hence the ERD) are especially well behaved with continuous movement of rigid or smoothly deforming objects.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1985
- Temporal covariance model of human motion perceptionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1984
- Application of the one-dimensional Fourier transform for tracking moving objects in noisy environmentsComputer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1983
- Phase Relationships Between Adjacent Simple Cells in the Visual CortexScience, 1981
- Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.Psychological Review, 1981
- Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1980
- A synaptic mechanism possibly underlying directional selectivity to motionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1978
- Spatial resolution for the detection of pattern and movement (real and apparent)Vision Research, 1978
- Pattern and movement detection in man and rabbit: Separation and comparison of occipital potentialsVision Research, 1978
- Model for Visual Luminance Discrimination and Flicker DetectionJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1968