Putting evidence into practice: how middle and low income countries “get it together”
- 28 October 2004
- Vol. 329 (7473) , 1036-1039
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1036
Abstract
Imagine a new drug that reduces the absolute risk of treatment failure by three quarters—a rare situation in the West but a reality in countries where malaria is endemic, and where adding artesunate to existing drugs has this effect on cure.1 In middle and low income countries, life threatening infectious diseases are everywhere: new drugs can therefore have large effects on outcomes, and even modest benefits from new interventions can have a dramatic impact on health overall. In addition, wasting resources on ineffective interventions results in technical inefficiencies and substantial opportunity costs in countries least able to afford them; the Global Fund's purchase of ineffective drugs is a recent example.2Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projectsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Amodiaquine for treating malariaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003
- Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration caused by acute diarrhoea in childrenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2002
- Complexity science: Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisationsBMJ, 2001
- Quality of Evidence for Treatment of Prostate CancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2000
- Artemisinin derivatives for treating uncomplicated malariaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1999
- Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesPublished by Wiley ,1999
- Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical JournalsJAMA, 1998