Disability and difference: balancing social and physical constructions: Figure 1:
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 27 (6) , 370-376
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.6.370
Abstract
The world of disability theory is currently divided between those who insist it reflects a physical fact affecting life quality and those who believe disability is defined by social prejudice. Despite a dialogue spanning bioethical, medical and social scientific literatures the differences between opposing views remains persistent. The result is similar to a figure-ground paradox in which one can see only part of a picture at any moment. This paper attempts to find areas of commonality between the opposing camps, and thus to rearrange the figures of the paradox at a fundamental level. The purpose is first to identify areas in which common ground can be achieved, and secondarily, to clarify the areas in which disagreement continues. While a general and unified theory of physical difference/disability is beyond the scope of this paper the result may advance that general goal.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pricing Life: Why It's Time for Health Care Rationing, by Peter A. Ubel, M.D. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000. 208 pp. $25.00Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2001
- Future states: the axioms underlying prospective, future-oriented, health planning instrumentsSocial Science & Medicine, 2000
- Procedure-related miscarriages and down syndrome–affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferencesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Life quality vs the ‘quality of life’:Social Science & Medicine, 2000
- Is there a coherent social conception of disability?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John HarrisJournal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Outrageous Fortune: The Risk of Suicide in Genetic Testing for Huntington DiseaseAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: a response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1999
- A Reply to David Pfeiffer 'The ICIDH and the Need for its Revision'Disability & Society, 1998
- Against All Odds: Positive Life Experiences of People with Advanced Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisHealth & Social Work, 1998