The Earthquake, Civil Society, and Political Change in Turkey: Assessment and Comparison with Eastern Europe
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Studies
- Vol. 50 (4) , 761-778
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00006
Abstract
Civil society has been widely celebrated as instrumental in democratization, but in some countries it remains poorly developed. Such was the case in Turkey, but many hoped that the 1999 earthquakes would lead to an invigoration of civil society and subsequent political liberalization. Examining this claim shows that Turkish civil society has not been able to sustain the energy it enjoyed immediately after the earthquake because of factors within civil society itself and the attitude of the state. This relative failure is then contrasted with the more positive experience of civil society in East-Central Europe. The comparisons reveal some limits to the utility of a civil society approach to democratization. I conclude by assessing the ability of other actors and factors to fashion political reform in Turkey today.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Turkish Democracy: Patronage versus GovernanceTurkish Studies, 2001
- Luxembourg, Helsinki and Beyond: Towards an Interpretation of Recent Turkey‐EU RelationsGovernment and Opposition, 2000
- Contemporary Turkish PoliticsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2000
- Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Politics in the Developing WorldPolitical Studies, 1998
- Modernization and PostmodernizationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1997
- Problems of Democratic Transition and ConsolidationPublished by Project MUSE ,1996
- The Dynamics of the Breakthrough in Eastern EuropePublished by University of California Press ,1991
- Interest Groups and Political Development in TurkeyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1984