Contemporary Impact of State Certificate-of-Need Regulations for Cardiac Surgery
- 14 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 114 (20) , 2122-2129
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.591214
Abstract
Background—Prior research using administrative data associated certificate-of-need (CON) regulation for open heart surgery with higher hospital coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) volume and lower CABG operative mortality rates in elderly patients. It is unclear whether these findings apply in a general population and after controlling for detailed clinical characteristics and region.Methods and Results—Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ (STS) National Cardiac Surgery Database, we examined isolated CABG surgery volume, operative mortality, and the composite end point of operative mortality or major morbidity for the years 2000 to 2003. The presence of CON regulations for open heart surgery was ascertained from the National Directory of the American Health Policy Association and by contacting CON administrators. Results were analyzed nationally, by state, and by region (West, Northeast, Midwest, South) and were adjusted for clinical factors and both population density and region with mixed-effects hierarchical logistic regression models. During 2000 to 2003, there were 314 710 isolated CABG surgeries performed at 294 STS hospitals in CON states (n=27, including Washington, DC) and 280 512 procedures at 343 STS hospitals in non-CON states (n=24). Patient clinical characteristics were similar among CON and non-CON hospitals. States with CON regulations tended to have higher population densities and had significantly higher median hospital annual CABG volumes in each of the years 2000 to 2003 (PP=0.32). There was a significant association between CON law and operative mortality in the South. After adjustment for patient risk factors and region, there was a marginally significant reduction of mortality risk in states with CON regulation (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.00). However, this difference was not statistically significant when a revised model accounted for random state effects. Similar volume and outcomes results were seen when the analysis was repeated with data from the national Medicare database.Conclusions—CON states have significantly higher hospital CABG surgery volumes but similar mortality compared with non-CON states. CON regulation alone is not a sufficient mechanism to ensure quality of care for CABG surgery.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volumes on the In-Hospital Mortality Rate for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Limited to Patients at High Risk?Circulation, 2004
- Validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery DatabasePublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Do Hospitals and Surgeons With Higher Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volumes Still Have Lower Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates?Circulation, 2003
- The society of thoracic surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk modelsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Comparing outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery: Is the New York Cardiac Surgery Reporting System model sensitive to changes in case mix?Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Certificate of Need and the Quality of Cardiac SurgeryAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2001
- Updates to the Data Quality Review Program: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac National DatabaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- The Public Release of Hospital and Physician Mortality Data in PennsylvaniaMedical Care, 1997
- Implications of cost in treatment selection for patients with coronary heart diseaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryMedical Care, 1991