Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy‐induced lesion size during step‐wise voltage ramping
- 12 December 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 103 (1) , 104-107
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07922.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if the starting voltage in a step-wise ramping protocol for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) alters the size of the renal lesion caused by the SWs. MATERIALS AND METHODS To address this question, one kidney from 19 juvenile pigs (aged 7–8 weeks) was treated in an unmodified Dornier HM-3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, GA, USA) with either 2000 SWs at 24 kV (standard clinical treatment, 120 SWs/min), 100 SWs at 18 kV followed by 2000 SWs at 24 kV or 100 SWs at 24 kV followed by 2000 SWs at 24 kV. The latter protocols included a 3–4 min interval, between the 100 SWs and the 2000 SWs, used to check the targeting of the focal zone. The kidneys were removed at the end of the experiment so that lesion size could be determined by sectioning the entire kidney and quantifying the amount of haemorrhage in each slice. The average parenchymal lesion for each pig was then determined and a group mean was calculated. RESULTS Kidneys that received the standard clinical treatment had a mean (sem) lesion size of 3.93 (1.29)% functional renal volume (FRV). The mean lesion size for the 18 kV ramping group was 0.09 (0.01)% FRV, while lesion size for the 24 kV ramping group was 0.51 (0.14)% FRV. The lesion size for both of these groups was significantly smaller than the lesion size in the standard clinical treatment group. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that initial voltage in a voltage-ramping protocol does not correlate with renal damage. While voltage ramping does reduce injury when compared with SWL with no voltage ramping, starting at low or high voltage produces lesions of the same approximate size. Our findings also suggest that the interval between the initial shocks and the clinical dose of SWs, in our one-step ramping protocol, is important for protecting the kidney against injury.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- RESISTIVE INDEX MEASUREMENTS OF RENAL PERFUSION DURING SWLJournal of Urology, 2008
- Comparison of Conventional and Step-Wise Shockwave Lithotripsy in Management of Urinary CalculiJournal of Endourology, 2007
- Plain abdominal radiography with transabdominal native tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography vs unenhanced computed tomography in renal colicBJU International, 2007
- Progressive Increase of Lithotripter Output Produces Better in-Vivo Stone ComminutionJournal of Endourology, 2006
- IS NEWER ALWAYS BETTER? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 3 LITHOTRIPTOR GENERATIONSJournal of Urology, 2005
- THE EFFECT OF TREATMENT STRATEGY ON STONE COMMINUTION EFFICIENCY IN SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSYJournal of Urology, 2004
- Shockwave Lithotripsy: Anecdotes and InsightsJournal of Endourology, 2003
- Morphological changes induced in the pig kidney by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Nephron injuryThe Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology, 2003
- Matched Pair Analysis of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Effectiveness for Comparison of LithotriptorsJournal of Urology, 2003
- Operator Experience and Adequate Anesthesia Improve Treatment Outcome with Third-Generation LithotriptersJournal of Endourology, 2001