Sample sizes for phase ii clinical trials derived from Bayesian decision theory
- 15 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 13 (23-24) , 2493-2502
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780132312
Abstract
In early phase clinical trials of a new medical treatment, patients are treated to decide whether there is sufficient promise to justify additional studies. A decision theoretic approach is proposed to help determine the number of patients that should be treated. The optimal sample size is obtained by maximizing a utility function which incorporates both the number of ‘gained successes’ and the costs of treatment. The method extends work of Sylvester and Staquet, and adopts a Bayesian formulation. Numbers of patients in later studies and in eventual routine use of the treatment are taken into account. We allow for the possibility that a later study might lead to an erroneous conclusion. The effects of these various influences on the recommended sampling plan for the early phase clinical trial are explored.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative phase II clinical trials procedure for choosing the best of three treatmentsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Corrected Loss Calculation for Phase II TrialsPublished by JSTOR ,1990
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- A Bayesian Approach to the Design of Phase II Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1988
- Statistical considerations for pilot studiesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1980
- Predictive Probability Early Termination Plans For Phase II Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agentJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1961
- The Process Curve and the Equivalent Mixed Binomial with Two ComponentsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1959