Effects of Carbapenem Exposure on the Risk for Digestive Tract Carriage of Intensive Care Unit-Endemic Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains in Critically Ill Patients
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 51 (6) , 1967-1971
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01483-06
Abstract
To determine the epidemiology and risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) digestive tract colonization, weekly rectal and pharyngeal swabs were obtained in two serial incidence surveys (266 patients). Forty-two (16%) patients were CR-PA colonized (12 [29%] on admission and 30 [71%] in intensive care units). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed extensive clonal diversity, although one specific clone (type B) was isolated from 11 patients. The presence of similar genotypes of CR-PA colonizing 30% of the CR-PA-colonized patients suggests the occurrence of cross-colonization; in addition, 10 pairs of carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa (CS-PA) and subsequent CR-PA strains isolated from the same patients were found to be clonally identical and were considered to have been endogenously acquired (33%). All endogenously acquired CR-PA strains were isolated after exposure to a carbapenem, and 80% showed a phenotype of imipenem resistance (IR pattern) alone, while 67% of the CR-PA strains acquired by cross-transmission exhibited a multiresistant (MR) phenotype, with previous carbapenem exposure in 44%. Logistic regression analysis identified severity of acute illness (odds ratio [OR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.1), prior carbapenem use (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 35.3), and prior use of fluoroquinolones (OR, 11.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 67.9) as independent risk factors for CR-PA digestive tract colonization. Overall, the local epidemiology of CR-PA digestive tract colonization was characterized by polyclonal endemicity with phenotype patterns of IR and MR divided evenly between patients. Restricting the use of particular agents, such as carbapenems and fluoroquinolones, should be considered advisable to minimize the problem of this antibiotic resistance. However, the possible risk for development of collateral unexpected bacterial resistance patterns should be accurately monitored.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selection of Cross-Resistance following Exposure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates to Ciprofloxacin or CefepimeAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2005
- Fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors for acquisition and impact on outcomesJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
- Endemic Multidrug-ResistantPseudomonas aeruginosain Critically Ill PatientsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- Risk factors for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infectionJournal of Hospital Infection, 2004
- Analysis of transmission pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa between patients and tap water outlets*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Multiple Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Our Worst Nightmare?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Cross-colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa of patients in an intensive care unitThorax, 1998
- Ribotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Surgical Intensive Care PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Epidemiology of Endemic Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Why Infection Control Efforts Have FailedThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1984
- A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1984