Incidence-based measures of birth, growth restriction, and death can free perinatal epidemiology from erroneous concepts of risk
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (9) , 889-897
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.018
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery ratesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- A united states national reference for fetal growthPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Invited Commentary: Intersecting Perinatal Mortality Curves by Gestational Age–Are Appearances Deceiving?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- PREGNANCY AND BLOOD LEADEpidemiology, 1998
- Comparisons of Infant Mortality Using a Percentile-Based Method of Standardization for Birthweight or Gestational AgeEpidemiology, 1998
- Birth weight and perinatal mortality. A comparison of the United States and NorwayJAMA, 1995
- Population Study of the Risk of Fetal Death and Its Relationship to Birthweight, Gestational Age, and RaceAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1994
- Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine.Published by JSTOR ,1987
- RISK OF UNEXPLAINED STILLBIRTH AT DIFFERENT GESTATIONAL AGESThe Lancet, 1987
- Birthweight and Perinatal Mortality: III. Towards a New Method of AnalysisInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986