Properties of a General Hierarchial City‐size Model
- 1 October 1976
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geographical Analysis
- Vol. 8 (4) , 395-405
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1976.tb00546.x
Abstract
Beckmann and McPherson recently outlined a general hierarchial model of city size. The authors argued that by imposing particular constraints upon this general model they would make it compatible both with the rank‐size rule and a much simpler (basic progression component) model previously outlined in the literature. The present paper challenges these two contentions. It is first demonstrated that the constraints proposed by Beckmann and McPherson do not lead to either form of compatibility. Then the author illustrates how such compatibility may in fact exist under somewhat different conditions.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- CITY SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN A CENTRAL PLACE HIERARCHY: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH*Journal of Regional Science, 1970
- CITY HIERARCHIES AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF CITY SIZE: A RECONSIDERATION OF BECKMANN'S CONTRIBUTIONJournal of Regional Science, 1969
- POPULATION OF PLACES IN A CENTRAL PLACE HIERARCHY†Journal of Regional Science, 1966
- City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City SizeEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1958