Diagnostic Performance of Stress Perfusion and Delayed-Enhancement MR Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 240 (1) , 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2401051161
Abstract
To prospectively determine the accuracy of a combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging approach (stress first-pass perfusion imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging) for depicting clinically significant coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70% stenosis) in patients suspected of having or known to have coronary artery disease (CAD), with coronary angiography serving as the reference standard. The committee on human research approved the study protocol, and all participants gave written informed consent. This study was HIPAA compliant. Forty-seven patients (38 men and nine women; mean age, 63 years +/- 5.3 [standard deviation]) scheduled for coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled: 33 were suspected of having CAD (group A) and 14 had experienced a previous myocardial infarction and were suspected of having new lesions (group B). The MR imaging protocol included cine function, gadolinium-enhanced stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging, and delayed-enhancement MR imaging. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a segment with perfusion deficit at stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and no hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging. Myocardial infarction was defined as an area with hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging. One patient was excluded from analysis because of poor-quality MR images. Coronary angiography depicted significant stenosis in 30 of 46 patients (65%). In a per-vessel analysis (n = 138), stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging yielded sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.89, and accuracy of 0.88, when compared with coronary angiography. The diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging was slightly better than that of stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging in the entire population (0.88 vs 0.85), in group A (0.86 vs 0.82), and in group B (0.93 vs 0.90). Stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging is an accurate method to depict significant coronary stenosis in patients suspected of having or known to have CAD.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noninfarcted Myocardium: Correlation between Dynamic First-Pass Contrast-enhanced Myocardial MR Imaging and Quantitative Coronary AngiographyRadiology, 2003
- Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2003
- Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease by Magnetic ResonanceCirculation, 2001
- Noninvasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia From Perfusion Reserve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceCirculation, 2000
- Relationship of MRI Delayed Contrast Enhancement to Irreversible Injury, Infarct Age, and Contractile FunctionCirculation, 1999
- A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1998
- Multislice MRI in Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Single-Vessel Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease Before and After RevascularizationCirculation, 1997
- Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging.Radiology, 1997
- Myocardial Gd-DTPA Kinetics Determine MRI Contrast Enhancement and Reflect the Extent and Severity of Myocardial Injury After Acute Reperfused InfarctionCirculation, 1996