Theophylline QID, TID, BID and Now QD?
- 8 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 4 (4) , 181-192
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1984.tb03353.x
Abstract
Dosing intervals for slow‐release theophylline preparations depend on the rate of formulation absorption, the rate of patient elimination, and clinically acceptable fluctuations in serum concentration. Three products, two new to the United States market, have received approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for 24‐hour dosing claims. Data submitted to the FDA for Theo‐24 (Searle) suggest slow but incomplete absorption in single‐dose studies, and multiple‐dose studies confirm incomplete absorption relative to plain theophylline tablets. Fluctuations in serum concentration expressed as a percentage of the trough value at steady state with Theo‐24 given once daily in the morning ranged from 48 to 1371% among 18 subjects; 13 of the 18 had greater than 100% fluctuation, which is the upper limit for fluctuations that can stay within the 10‐ to 20‐μg/ml therapeutic range. Among another 18 subjects with somewhat slower and less variable rates of elimination, fluctuations ranged from 40–168% at steady state, with 4 of 18 greater than 100% during daily dosing with Theo‐24; all subjects had fluctuations less than 100% (39–92%) when they were given Theo‐durà tablets every 12 hours. Theo‐dur tablets have also received FDA approval for once daily administrations, but only 1 of 14 subjects in a submitted study had fluctuations less than 100% and thus was able to stay within the therapeutic range. No data were available on the absorption of Uniphyl, also approved for once‐daily dosing, but large fluctuations in serum concentration are apparent from advertisements for the European product Uniphyllin, and are also suggested by presentations on Uniphyl at a recent scientific meeting. Current standards for receiving FDA approval for 24‐hour dosing appear to be inconsistent with the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of theophylline and fail to consider the greater risks from variability in absorption when a single, large daily dose is taken.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Basis for the Selection and Use of Slow Release Theophylline ProductsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1984
- Comparison of orally administered metaproterenol and theophylline in the control of chronic asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Sustained-release theophylline: A significant advance in the treatment of childhood asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Relationship of formulation and dosing interval to fluctuation of serum theophylline concentration in children with chronic asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- The Value of Maintenance Theophylline in Steroid-Dependent AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Dose-dependent kinetics for theophylline: Observations among ambulatory asthmatic childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1980
- Evaluation of the absorption from some commercial sustained-release theophylline productsJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1980
- Dose-dependent kinetics of theophylline disposition in asthmatic childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1977
- Relationship of theophylline clearance to oral dosage in children with chronic asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1977
- Evaluation of oral bronchodilator therapy in asthmatic childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1974