The Entrepreneur's Initial Contact with a Venture Capitalist: Why Good Projects May Choose to Wait
Preprint
- 3 August 1999
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We show that a profit-maximizing entrepreneur may deliberately shun approaching a venture capitalist in the very first stages of a project's life. To avoid a potential moral hazard problem the entrepreneur will instead develop the project on his own up to a certain stage. By doing so, the entrepreneur will enhance his bargaining position, and capture a larger share of the total surplus. In this paper we construct a highly stylized model for the decision problem faced by the entrepreneur. With this model we derive the condition for the optimal delay from the birth of the project until a contact with a venture capitalist is established. This delay will depend on the competitive pressure in the market, and on the skill of the entrepreneur. Our model implies that the market for a venture capitalist's services at the start-up stage of a project is likely to fail due to adverse selection.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Venture capital growing pains: Should the market diet?Journal of Banking & Finance, 1998
- Grandstanding in the venture capital industryJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture CapitalThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- A Control Theory of Venture Capital FinanceJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1994
- Robust Financial Contracting and the Role of Venture CapitalistsThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- New Directions in Research on Venture Capital FinanceFinancial Management, 1994
- Entrepreneurial Ability, Venture Investments, and Risk SharingManagement Science, 1990
- Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs?Journal of Business Venturing, 1990
- On the Positive Role of Financial Intermediation in Allocation of Venture Capital in a Market with Imperfect InformationThe Journal of Finance, 1983
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960