Measurement of Outcomes of General Practice: Comparison of Three Health Status Measures

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The broad range of medical problems seen in general practice means that the assessment of health outcomes shares much with the assessment of health status in the general community. The last two decades have seen considerable progress in health status measurement for this purpose. This paper reports the use of three such measures in a general practice setting. The ‘Rand health insurance study battery’, the ‘sickness impact profile’ and the ‘general health questionnaire’ were tested in two general practices in Sydney, Australia, to determine patient compliance, to assess the range of scores and discriminative ability of the instruments, and to compare the different instruments. There was a high degree of acceptance of the questionnaires, showing that patients visiting their general practitioners are prepared to complete such questionnaires. The range of scores obtained was less skewed for the Rand measures than for the sickness impact profile or the general health questionnaire, suggesting that the Rand measures should be the preferred general health status measure.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: