Determining Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms: Can the WHO Classification System Be Simplified?
- 10 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 25 (35) , 5609-5615
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.12.9809
Abstract
Purpose The WHO classification for well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) incorporates both stage and grade. This study compares the prognostic value of a simplified staging and grading system with the WHO system in a large single-institution study. Patients and Methods A prospective database (1982 to 2005) identified 183 patients who underwent operative treatment for PENs. Tumors were staged (< 2 cm primary, ≥ 2 cm primary, or metastases) and graded (low grade: no necrosis and < two mitoses/50 high-powered fields [HPF]; or intermediate grade: necrosis and/or ≥ two mitoses/50 HPF) with a simplified schema. Influence of stage and grade on recurrence and disease-specific survival (DSS) was determined. Prognostic strength was assessed with the concordance index (CI). Results Median age of the 183 patients was 56 years, and 53% were women. Median follow-up time was 44 months (range, 1 to 226 months). Classification identified 28 patients (15%) with WHO 1.1 disease, 74 (41%) with 1.2 disease, and 81 (44%) with 2.0 disease. Classification by stage identified 35 patients (19%) with tumors less than 2 cm, 96 (52%) with tumors ≥ 2 cm, and 52 (29%) with nodal or distant metastases. Tumors were low grade in 102 patients (56%). Earlier stage tumors were more likely to be low grade (< 2 cm, 83%; ≥ 2 cm, 61%; metastases, 28%; P < .001). The WHO classification, tumor stage, and grade were associated with 5-year DSS (P < .001). Tumors ≥ 2 cm or metastases are stratified by grade (5-year DSS rate for low v intermediate grade: ≥ 2 cm, 97% v 80%, respectively; P < .001; metastases, 93% v 62%, respectively; P = .05). The CI was 0.72 for WHO, 0.71 for stage, 0.66 for grade, and 0.76 for stage combined with grade. Conclusion Accurate prognostic information can be obtained by combining tumor size and metastases with simple grading information based on necrosis and mitotic rate.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regressionBiometrika, 2005
- Advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumorsCurrent Treatment Options in Oncology, 2005
- Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 136 Cases With a Proposal for Low-Grade and Intermediate-Grade GroupsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Islet Cell Tumors of the Head of the Pancreas: Long‐term Survival AnalysisWorld Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Nonfunctioning islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas: Survival results in a contemporary series of 163 patientsSurgery, 2001
- An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumorsCancer, 2000
- Surgical experience with pancreatic and peripancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: review of 125 patientsJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998
- Survival Analysis of 200 Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors With Clarification of Criteria for Atypical Carcinoid and Its Separation From Typical CarcinoidThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1998
- Medical Treatment of Neuroendocrine Gut and Pancreatic TumorsActa Oncologica, 1989
- Nonfunctioning Islet Cell TumorsAnnals of Surgery, 1981