Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
- Vol. 18 (3) , 369-396
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490078
Abstract
(1996). Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics: Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 369-396.This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facts and Myths about RefereeingJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from AuthorsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990
- An Evaluation of 50 "Ranked" Economics Departments: By Quantity and Quality of Faculty Publications and Graduate Student Placement and Research SuccessSouthern Economic Journal, 1985
- Computer-assisted referee selection as a means of reducing potential editorial biasBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982
- Norms and functions in citation: The view of journal editors and referees in psychologySocial Science Information Studies, 1982
- THE NEED FOR A THEORY OF CITINGJournal of Documentation, 1981
- The Ranking of Southern Economics Departments: New Criterion and Further EvidenceSouthern Economic Journal, 1978
- Citation Analysis: Queries and CaveatsSocial Studies of Science, 1977
- SELF‐CITATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATUREJournal of Documentation, 1977
- Some Empirical Evidence on the Variables Associated with the Ranking of Economics JournalsSouthern Economic Journal, 1976