Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 77 (2) , 297-322
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1958917
Abstract
Some recent theories have blamed the growth of government on budget-maximizing bureaucrats who are assumedly capable of imposing their most preferred budget-output combination on legislatures, subject to cost and demand constraints. However, theoretical examination of the range of bargaining outcomes that might occur between bureau and legislature shows that budget-maximizing behavior does not necessarily lead to super-optimal levels of production, nor do the suggested reforms of competition and privatization necessarily improve the situation. In this bargaining model, the central determinants of governmental growth are not budget-maximizing bureaucrats, but the legislature's decisions regarding mode of oversight and form of internal organization.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A GeneralizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Representation of high demand constituencies on review committees: A research notePublic Choice, 1981
- Outside Information and the Degree of Monopoly Power of a Public BureauSouthern Economic Journal, 1980
- Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quoPublic Choice, 1978
- The Equilibrium Size of a Budget-maximizing Bureau: A Note on Niskanen's Theory of BureaucracyJournal of Political Economy, 1975
- Aneconomic analysis of government ownership and reculationPublic Choice, 1974
- Toward a general theory of managerial discretionPublic Choice, 1974
- Efficiency in the provision of fire servicesPublic Choice, 1973
- The Efficiency of Public versus Private Firms, the Case of Australia's Two AirlinesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1971
- The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget ReformPublic Administration Review, 1966