Using Film to Analyze Pedestrian Behavior
- 1 February 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 10 (3) , 347-375
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124182010003007
Abstract
Previous research on individual, interpersonal, and collective units of pedestrian behavior is briefly summarized and critically evaluated. An alternative theoretical framework and methodological procedure are presented. The imposition of cartesian coordinates on a film record, corrected for “foreshortened perspective,” permits the accurate location, and systematic measurement of distances between, directions, and velocities of individual pedestrian movement. An index of coordinated movement permits the identification and comparison of the extent of collective locomotion within pedestrian streams and other aggregations of persons in public places. The framework and procedures are illustrated with the analysis of a film record of a short sequence of pedestrian behavior. Implications are discussed for several theoretical and applied problems.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mead vs. Blumer: The Divergent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviorism and Symbolic InteractionismAmerican Sociological Review, 1979
- Effects of Urban Noise and Sidewalk Density upon Pedestrian Cooperation and TempoThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1978
- The Not-So-Lonely Crowd: Friendship Groups in Collective BehaviorSociometry, 1977
- On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motionTransportation Research, 1974
- Patterns of Public Behaviour: Collision Avoidance on a Pedestrian CrossingSemiotica, 1974
- Sexual Differences in Human Crowd MotionNature, 1972
- A Cross-National Comparison of Some Social Patterns of Urban PedestriansJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1971
- The Statistics of Crowd FluidsNature, 1971
- The Distribution of Free-Forming Small Group SizeAmerican Sociological Review, 1953
- A Preliminary Study of the Size Determinant in Small Group InteractionAmerican Sociological Review, 1951