IMPULSE CONTROL IN PIGEONS1
- 1 May 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 21 (3) , 485-489
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485
Abstract
Pigeons were given a small, immediate food reinforcement for pecking a key, and a larger, delayed reinforcement for not pecking this key. Most subjects pecked the key on more than 95% of trials. However, when pecking a differently colored key at an earlier time prevented this option from becoming available, three of 10 subjects consistently pecked it, thereby forcing themselves to wait for the larger reward. They did not peck the earlier key when it did not prevent this option. This is an experimental example of psychological impulse and a learnable device to control it. Although only a minority of the subjects learned it, the fact that such learning is possible at all argues for a theory of delayed reward that can predict change of preference as a function of elapsing time.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- ASSOCIATIVE FACTORS UNDERLYING THE PIGEON'S KEY PECKING IN AUTO‐SHAPING PROCEDURES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- Differential reinforcement of low rates: A selective critique.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- PREFERENCE FOR FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- CHOICE AND DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- Immediate reward followed by extinction vs. later reward without extinctionPsychonomic Science, 1966
- Decision making by rats: Delay versus amount of reward.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965
- Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962
- Correlated delay of reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961
- Notes on the Concept of CommitmentAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1960
- Time as a determinant in integrative learning.Psychological Review, 1945