Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Lopinavir-Ritonavir with and without Saquinavir or Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Previously Treated with Protease Inhibitors
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 52 (9) , 3276-3283
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00224-08
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children and adolescents who are failing antiretrovirals may have a better virologic response when drug exposures are increased, using higher protease inhibitor doses or ritonavir boosting. We studied the pharmacokinetics and safety of high-dose lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-experienced patients, using an LPV/r dose of 400/100 mg/m2orally every 12 h (p.o. q12h) (without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]), or 480/120 mg/m2p.o. q12h (with NNRTI). We calculated the LPV inhibitory quotient (IQ), and when the IQ was 0.75 log10, with a median maximal decrease in viral load of −1.57 log10copies/ml at week 8. At week 2, 19 subjects showed a median LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 157.2 (range, 62.8 to 305.5) μg·h/ml and median LPV trough concentration (Ctrough) of 10.8 (range, 4.1 to 25.3) μg/ml. In 16 subjects with SQV added, the SQV median AUC was 33.7 (range, 4.4 to 76.5) μg·h/ml and the median SQVCtroughwas 2.1 (range, 0.2 to 4.1) μg/ml. At week 24, 18 of 26 (69%) subjects remained in the study. Between weeks 24 and 48, one subject withdrew for nonadherence and nine withdrew for persistently high virus load. In antiretroviral-experienced children and adolescents with HIV, high doses of LPV/r with or without SQV offer safe options for salvage therapy, but the modest virologic response and the challenge of adherence to a regimen with a high pill burden may limit the usefulness of this approach.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacokinetics of Two Randomized Trials Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Indinavir, Saquinavir and Lopinavir in Combination with Low-Dose Ritonavir: The MaxCmin1 and 2 TrialsBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2007
- High-Dose Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Highly Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Patients: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictors of ResponseHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2007
- Ability of different lopinavir genotypic inhibitory quotients to predict 48-week virological response in highly treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavirJournal of Medical Virology, 2006
- Population Analysis of Weight-, Age-, and Sex-Related Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir in Children from Birth to 18 YearsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006
- The LOPSAQ study: 48 week analysis of a boosted double protease inhibitor regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir without additional antiretroviral therapyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Antiretroviral activity and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir in protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-infected children with severe-moderate immunodeficiencyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Safety and Antiviral Response at 12 Months of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1-Infected Children Experienced With Three Classes of AntiretroviralsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2005
- Immunological Changes after Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy with Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected ChildrenAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2005
- Saquinavir drug exposure is not impaired by the boosted double protease inhibitor combination of lopinavir/ritonavirAIDS, 2004
- Randomized Trial to Evaluate Indinavir/Ritonavir versus Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Patients: The MaxCmin1 TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003