Response: Organizations Are Not Central Tendencies: Shadowboxing in the Dark, Round 2
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 13 (1) , 133-137
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306813
Abstract
The article presents a response by William H. Glick to a commentary on his paper “Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research.” Glick notes the differences in definitions of organizational climate (OC). One definition classifies OC as a psychological construct, the other defines it as an organizational attribute. He acknowledges that the alternate viewpoints help to identify fundamental differences between two schools of thought in organizational science.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- DUAL COMMITMENT AND LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONSHIP CLIMATES.The Academy of Management Journal, 1986
- Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Hypothesized Interdependence, Assumed IndependenceAcademy of Management Review, 1984
- Theories of Organizational CultureOrganization Studies, 1984
- Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational CulturesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- R&D WORK CLIMATE AND INNOVATION IN SEMICONDUCTORS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1983
- Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic ConstrualAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1982
- Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Organizational Symbolism: A Topic To Expand Organizational AnalysisAcademy of Management Review, 1980
- Group climate: An exploratory analysis of construct validityOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977