Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife conservation programs in Kenya
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 8 (2) , 133-144
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929509380907
Abstract
We present a case study of the social issues of wildlife conservation in Kenya based on field work in and near Nairobi and Tsavo National Parks. Surveys of small‐scale cultivators and pastoralists (157) and local park officials (44) reveal that there are widespread negative feelings and perceptions of local people toward state policies and programs of wildlife conservation. For instance, 84% of the local people reported that there is a bad relationship between the national park management and the local community; only 10% stated that the park is an asset to them; and 57% asserted that the park should be abolished. Moreover, perceptions and attitudes of local people and park officials are greatly disparate with regard to the benefits the parks provide for local people, the level of conflict between local people and wildlife, and the future of the parks.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in TanzaniaBiological Conservation, 1993
- Underselling national parks in Zimbabwe: The implications for rural sustainabilitySociety & Natural Resources, 1990
- Wildlife Conservation Outside Protected Areas—Lessons from an Experiment in ZambiaConservation Biology, 1990
- GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA ∗The Professional Geographer, 1988
- The Prospect for Desertification in Kajiado District, KenyaThe Geographical Journal, 1986
- Planning and Environmental Risk in Kenyan DrylandsGeographical Review, 1985
- National Parks in Savannah AfricaScience, 1972