Monopoly Pricingand Regulatory Oversight
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 1 (1) , 203-233
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00203.x
Abstract
This paper analyzes the interaction between a regulator and monopolist in the determination of the price for the monopolist's product, where only the monoplast knows ex ante its true marginal cost of production. The regulator observes the market price proposed by the monopolist and decides whether to hold a rate hearing, where suck a hearing is a costly means of verifying the monopolist's marginal cost. Subsequent to a rate hearing, the regulator can impose a market price for the monopolist's product; in the absence of a rate hearing, the market price is set equal to the monopolist's proposed price. Equilibrium behavior by the monopolist and regulator is characterized, and the degree of regulatory “activism,” as defined by the probability a rate hearing is held, is seen to vary ex post with the monopolist's true marginal cost.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and AuditingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Equilibrium Selection in Signaling GamesEconometrica, 1987
- Equilibrium Verification and Reporting Policies in a Model of Tax ComplianceInternational Economic Review, 1986
- Using Cost Observation to Regulate FirmsJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Regulation, Asymmetric Information, and AuditingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete InformationEconometrica, 1983
- Optimal Regulation of a Multiproduct Monopoly with Unknown Technological CapabilitiesThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1983
- Inflation and Environmental Concern: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Price RegulationThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1974
- The Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory HearingThe Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1972
- Private Vice and Public VirtueThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1961