MDRD or CKD-EPI study equations for estimating prevalence of stage 3 CKD in epidemiological studies: which difference? Is this difference relevant?

This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:

• Discrepancies between creatinine‐based and cystatin C‐based equations in estimating prevalence of stage 3 chronic kidney disease in an elderly population
  Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2009
• Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States
  JAMA, 2007
• Using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft and Gault equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in older people
  Age and Ageing, 2007
• Why the MDRD equation should not be used in patients with normal renal function (and normal creatinine values)?
  Clinical Nephrology, 2006
• International Comparison of the Relationship of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevalence and ESRD Risk
  Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
• Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays?
  Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2006
• Estimation of Renal Function in Subjects With Normal Serum Creatinine Levels: Influence of Age and Body Mass Index
  American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2005
• Predictive Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault Equations for Estimating Renal Function
  Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
• Serial assessment of glomerular filtration rate in lupus nephropathy
  Kidney International, 1988
• STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
  The Lancet, 1986