The macro impacts of Korea's Heavy industry drive re‐evaluated
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 29 (1) , 24-48
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389208422260
Abstract
The Korean heavy industry (HCI) drive has been criticised for the misallocation of capital and for negative spillover effects on growth, inflation, the current account and debt. However, such criticism places too much blame on HCI for the late ‐ 1970s' economic deterioration and gives HCI insufficient credit for the subsequent economic rebound. Korean HCI was a catch‐up exercise which attracted cheap foreign capital to accelerate structural change. Nevertheless, the mid‐1970s' decision to pursue HCI as a Big Push was flawed since it did result in project bunching that strained implementation capacity, despite the safeguards which Korea built into its HCI strategy.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: SOUTH KOREAN STEEL AND PETROCHEMICALSTijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 1991
- Industrialization and the Big PushJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- EXPORT PROMOTION AND THE “HEAVY INDUSTRIALIZATION” OF KOREA, 1973–83The Developing Economies, 1989
- The Politics of Industrialization in the Republic of Korea and TaiwanPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- The effect of financial liberalization on the efficiency of credit allocation: Some evidence from KoreaJournal of Development Economics, 1988
- Korea's macroeconomic prospects and policy issues for the next decadeWorld Development, 1988
- Korean Growth PolicyBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987
- Industrial strategy and technological change: Theory versus realityJournal of Development Economics, 1986
- External Debt and Macroeconomic Performance in Latin America and East AsiaBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1985
- Assessing the performance of infant industriesJournal of Development Economics, 1984