The direct anti-viral activity of single stranded polyribonucleotides I. Potentiation of activity by mixtures of polymers which do not anneal
- 19 September 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences
- Vol. 198 (1133) , 411-428
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1977.0106
Abstract
Mixtures containing equal masses of poly(I) and copolymers containing poly(5-hydroxycytidylic acid) [poly(ho5C) copolymers] protect mice against encephalomyocarditis (e.m.c.) virus infection and the protective effect is greatest 6 h before infection. The batches of poly(ho5C) copolymer used in these studies were obtained by Br water treatment of poly(C) and contained cytidine, bromocytidine and hydroxycytidine residues with the latter component comprising 50-81% of the total residues in different preparations. These copolymers were used in solution or in a gelled form obtained by freezing in the absence of salt. Evidence is presented which shows that double stranded complexes do not form when the poly(ho5C) copolymers are mixed with poly(I). Protection of mice with mixtures of poly(I) and poly(ho5C) copolymer was slightly greater than was previously observed with sequential administration of poly(I) followed by poly(C) or the homopolymer form of poly(ho5C). The gelled form of poly(ho5C) copolymer conferred slightly greater protection than soluble poly(ho5C) copolymer. The percentage of hydroxycytidine residues in the copolymers did not affect the degree of protection conferred by mixtures of the copolymers with poly(I). Administration of mixtures of poly(I) and soluble poly(ho5C) copolymer i.p. was more effective than i.v. when high doses were used at 6 h before infection. At this time, 200 .mu.g/mouse of a mixture of poly(I) and poly(ho5C) copolymer was as protective as 60 .mu.g/mouse poly(I:C) but the toxicity of mixtures of poly(I) and poly(ho5C) was less than 1/10 that of poly(I:C). The mechanism of the protective effect with single stranded polynucleotides cannot yet be stated. However, the protection by mixtures of poly(I) and poly(ho5C) copolymer does not seem to be through interferon production. Serum from mice treated with the mixture of polynucleotides cannot confer protection on other mice subsequently exposed to infection. The mixtures do not hypo-reactivate the protective effect of poly(I:C) treatment which would be expected if both effects had a common basis in the interferon phenomenon. Treatment with the mixture does not result in a stimulation of immune response produced by e.m.c. virus infection.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- IN VIVO ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF POLYNUCLEOTIDE MIMICS OF STRATEGIC REGIONS IN VIRAL RNAAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977
- Oligonucleotide mapping of picornavirus RNAs by two-dimensional electrophoresisVirology, 1976
- PROLONGED SURVIVAL OF RABBIT SKIN AND KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS FOLLOWING DONOR TREATMENT WITH CYTOSINE ARABINOSIDETransplantation, 1975
- Enzymatic acylation of histidine to mengovirus RNANature, 1974
- Poly(5-hydroxycytidylic acid)Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis, 1973
- 352. Note: Conservatism of the Approximation Σ(O - E) 2 /E in the Logrank Test for Survival Data or Tumor Incidence DataPublished by JSTOR ,1973
- Poly(rI) more important than poly(rC) in the interferon induction process by poly(rI)·poly(rC)Virology, 1973
- Studies on the Toxicity and Antiviral Activity of Various PolynucleotidesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1973
- Structural requirements of the rIn·rCn complex for Induction of human interferonJournal of Molecular Biology, 1972
- Antiviral Activity of Polyribocytidylic Acid in Cells Primed with Polyriboinosinic AcidScience, 1971