The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory
- 1 August 1996
- Vol. 18 (8) , 678-683
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950180812
Abstract
The neutral theory of molecular evolution has been instrumental in organizing our thinking about the nature of evolutionary forces shaping variation at the DNA level. More importantly, it has provided empiricists with a strong set of testable predictions and hence, a useful null hypothesis against which to test for the presence of selection. Evidence indicates that the neutral theory cannot explain key features of protein evolution nor patterns of biased codon usage in certain species. Whereas we now have a reasonable model of selection acting on synonymous changes inDrosophila, protein evolution remains poorly understood. Despite limitations in the applicability of the neutral theory, it is likely to remain an integral part of the quest to understand molecular evolution.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR NATURAL SELECTIONAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1995
- The molecular and population genetics of cyclodiene insecticide resistanceInsect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1994
- The Nearly Neutral Theory of Molecular EvolutionAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1992
- Multigene families and the evolution of complexityJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1991
- Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clockJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1987
- DNA and the neutral theoryPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1986
- Mutant substitutions at linked nucleotide sitesAdvances in Applied Probability, 1982
- Role of very slightly deleterious mutations in molecular evolution and polymorphismTheoretical Population Biology, 1976