Sequelae of parenteral domoic acid administration in rats: Comparison of effects on different anatomical markers in brain
- 1 April 1997
- Vol. 25 (4) , 350-358
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199704)25:4<350::aid-syn6>3.0.co;2-9
Abstract
Brain damage following administration of domoic acid, a structural analog of the excitatory amino acids glutamic acid and kainic acid, was compared using different anatomic markers in adult rats. Seven days after administration of domoic acid (2.25 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle, brains were collected and sectioned and stained to visualize Nissl substance using thionin, argyrophilia using a cupric silver staining method, astroglia using immunohistochemistry to detect glial fibrillary acidic protein‐like immunoreactivity (GFAP‐ir), and activated microglia using lectin histochemistry to detect Griffonia simplicifolia I‐B4 isolectin (GSI‐B4) binding in adjacent sections. In approximately 60% of rats to which it was administered, domoic acid caused stereotyped behavior within 60 min, followed by convulsions within 2–3 h. Brains of domoic acid‐administered rats that did not manifest stereotyped behavior or convulsions did not differ from brains from vehicle‐administered controls. In animals that had manifested stereotyped behavior and convulsions, Nissl staining was mostly unremarkable in brain sections. In contrast, there was intense argyrophilia in anterior olfactory nucleus, CA1 hippocampus, lateral septum, parietal (layer IV), piriform, and entorhinal cortices, ventral posterolateral thalamus, and amygdala. This pattern was reminiscent of that seen in postmortem specimens from humans who consumed domoic acid‐tainted mussels and in experimental animals after kainic acid administration. Adjacent sections displayed astrogliosis, evidenced by increased GFAP‐ir, which was more diffuse than the argyrophilic reaction. Activated microglia were revealed using GSI‐B4 histochemistry. These data suggest activation of discrete brain circuits in rats that convulse following domoic acid administration and subsequent pathological alterations. The data strongly suggest that neuropathology following domoic acid occurs only in animals manifesting domoic acid‐induced sterotypy and convulsions. The data do not rule out more insidious damage in behaviorally normal rats that receive domoic acid. Synapse 25:350–358, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. 1 This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood-brain barrier dysfunctions following systemic injection of kainic acid in the ratPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Early and transient increase of rat hippocampal blood-brain barrier permeability to amino acids during kainic acid-induced seizuresNeuroscience Letters, 1995
- Histological and ultrastructural localization of the kainate receptor subunits, KA2 and GluR6/7, in the rat nervous system using selective antipeptide antibodiesJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1994
- Patterns of Fos Expression Suggest Similar Mechanisms of Action for the Excitotoxins Domoic and Kainic AcidaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Regional distribution of mRNA for a putative kainate receptor in rat brainEuropean Journal of Pharmacology: Molecular Pharmacology, 1990
- Neurologic Sequelae of Domoic Acid Intoxication Due to the Ingestion of Contaminated MusselsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- An Outbreak of Toxic Encephalopathy Caused by Eating Mussels Contaminated with Domoic AcidNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Lectin binding by resting and reactive microgliaJournal of Neurocytology, 1987
- Long-Term Effects of Early Status Epilepticus on the Acquisition of Conditioned Avoidance Behavior in RatsEpilepsia, 1986
- Blood-brain barrier changes with kainic acid-induced limbic seizuresExperimental Neurology, 1983