Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part two
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- focus on-psychometric
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 16 (1) , 77-81
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160110
Abstract
This article is the second and concluding part of a discussion of the importance of sensitivity to change in selecting an outcome measure for a study evaluating a nursing intervention. In Part One of the discussion, (Stewart & Archbold, 1992) the relative lack of attention to measurement sensitivity in the nursing and measurement literature was described. Three factors to consider in selecting an outcome measure for an intervention study were reviewed: the conceptual link between the intervention and the outcome variable, the extent to which the outcome variable is amenable to change, and content validity. In Part Two, four additional factors are discussed: construct validity, distribution of scores on the outcome measure, reliability, and correlational stability over time. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Focus on psychometrics nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part oneResearch in Nursing & Health, 1992
- Current and Future Direction in Family Caregiving ResearchThe Gerontologist, 1989
- Aptitude-treatment interaction research in the clinical setting: A review of attempts to dispel the "patient uniformity" myth.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- A methodological framework for assessing health indicesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- The Measurement of Change in Nursing ResearchNursing Research, 1982
- Dependent variable reliability and the power of significance tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting PeriodsReview of Educational Research, 1977
- Reassertion of the paradoxical power of tests of significance based on unreliable difference scores.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Comment on Overall and Woodward's asserted paradox concerning the measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 1976