Discussion: Gold is not always good enough: the shortcomings of randomization when evaluating interventions in small heterogeneous samples
- 31 December 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (12) , 1219-1222
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Ischemic EventsCirculation, 2003
- Impact of random assignment on study outcome: An empirical examinationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials?BMJ, 1998
- Pre-operative aspirin decreases platelet aggregation and increases post-operative blood loss — a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial in 100 patients with chronic stable anginaEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Randomised controlled trial of oxytocin alone versus oxytocin and ergometrine in active management of third stage of labour.BMJ, 1993
- Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1978
- On the Use of Pocock and Simon's Method for Balancing Treatment Numbers over Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical TrialBiometrics, 1976
- Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groupsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1974