Is Coase a Realist?
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Philosophy of the Social Sciences
- Vol. 28 (1) , 5-31
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319802800101
Abstract
Ronald Coase has been a vigorous critic of mainstream economic theory, arguing that it is unrealistic and that a good theory is realistic. The attributes "realistic" and "unrealistic" appear in three senses at least in Coase: one related to narrow ness and breadth; another related to abstracting from particularities (and the issue of "blackboard economics"); and the third related to correspondence with the legal. This does not yet make Coase an advocate of realism. It is therefore separately argued that each of the three kinds of "realisticness" as a property of theories is consistent with realism as a theory of theories.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Universals and the methodenstreit: a re-examination of Carl Menger's conception of economics as an exact scienceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1997
- Samuelson's operationalist-descriptivist thesisJournal of Economic Methodology, 1995
- The two Coasian traditionsReview of Political Economy, 1994
- Ronald H. CoasePublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- Nobel Laureate: Ronald Coase and MethodologyJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1993
- Milton FriedmanPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1990
- Economics and Contiguous DisciplinesThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1978
- The Lighthouse in EconomicsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1974
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960
- The Nature of the FirmEconomica, 1937