Evaluation of Amphotericin B Interpretive Breakpoints for Candida Bloodstream Isolates by Correlation with Therapeutic Outcome
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 50 (4) , 1287-1292
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.50.4.1287-1292.2006
Abstract
One hundred seven Candida bloodstream isolates (51 C. albicans, 24 C. glabrata, 13 C. parapsilosis, 13 C. tropicalis, 2 C. dubliniensis, 2 C. krusei, and 2 C. lusitaniae strains) from patients treated with amphotericin B alone underwent in vitro susceptibility testing against amphotericin B using five different methods. Fifty-four isolates were from patients who failed treatment, defined as death 7 to 14 days after the incident candidemia episode, having persistent fever of ≥5 days9 duration after the date of the incident candidemia, or the recurrence of fever after two consecutive afebrile days while on antifungal treatment. MICs were determined by using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (formally National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) broth microdilution procedure with two media and by using Etest. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were also measured in two media. Broth microdilution tests with RPMI 1640 medium generated a restricted range of MICs (0.125 to 1 μg/ml); the corresponding MFC values ranged from 0.5 to 4 μg/ml. Broth microdilution tests with antibiotic medium 3 produced a broader distribution of MIC and MFC results (0.015 to 0.25 μg/ml and 0.06 to 2 μg/ml, respectively). Etest produced the widest distribution of MICs (0.094 to 2 μg/ml). However, none of the test formats studied generated results that significantly correlated with therapeutic success or failure.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species and In Vitro Susceptibilities of Isolates Collected from 1998 to 2000 in a Population-Based Active Surveillance ProgramJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Candidemia in a Tertiary Care Cancer CenterMedicine, 2003
- Has Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Come of Age?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Improved Detection of Amphotericin B-Resistant Isolates of Candida lusitaniae by EtestJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Do In Vitro Susceptibility Data Predict the Microbiologic Response to Amphotericin B? Results of a Prospective Study of Patients withCandidaFungemiaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Emergence of Resistance to Amphotericin B During Therapy for Candida glabrata Infection in an Immunocompetent HostClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing: enhanced ability to detect amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolatesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1995
- Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based systemAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1995
- Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study GroupAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1995
- Disseminated Candidiasis Due to Amphotericin B-Resistant Candida albicansThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992