Ecological Modernization and Consumption: A Reply
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 17 (3) , 261-265
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920490270302
Abstract
This contribution balances Carolan's claim that ecological modernization perspectives fall short in adequately dealing with consumption, by referring to four major points. First, Carolan misinterprets ecological modernization where he claims that this perspective only argues for more production (and consumption). Second, Carolan is wrong in stating that ecological modernization has basically neglected issues of consumption as it has been part and parcel of the theory for some time. Third, he is incoherent with respect to the issue of downsizing consumption in a demodernization way. Finally, the approach taken by Carolan to debate the environmental dimensions of consumption brings us back to Malthusian debates of the 1970s, instead of moving forward to a more sociological theory and perspective of sustainable consumption.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Greening the grid : the ecological modernisation of network-bound systemsPublished by Wageningen University and Research ,2024
- The proof of the pudding: urban recycling in North America as a process of ecological modernisationEnvironmental Politics, 2003
- Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy PerspectiveSociety & Natural Resources, 2003
- Confronting ConsumptionPublished by MIT Press ,2002
- Advanced industrial countriesEnvironmental Politics, 2000
- Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social changeSociety & Natural Resources, 1992
- Introduction to the Sociology of ConsumptionSociology, 1990