Oral Etoposide for Refractory and Relapsed Neuroblastoma
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (10) , 3221-3225
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3221
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the efficacy of oral etoposide against resistant stage 4 neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory or recurrent stage 4 neuroblastoma were treated with etoposide 50 mg/m2 taken orally each day, in two or three divided doses, for 21 consecutive days. Treatment could be repeated after a 1-week period. Extent-of-disease studies included imaging with 131-iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine and extensive bone marrow (BM) sampling. RESULTS: Oral etoposide was used in 20 children between the ages of 2 and 11 years (median, 6 years). Prior treatment included high doses of alkylating agents and a median of 4.5 cycles of etoposide-containing chemotherapy, with cumulative etoposide doses of 1,800 mg/m2 to 3,935 mg/m2 (median, 2,300 mg/m2). Oral etoposide produced antineuroblastoma effects in four of four children with disease refractory to intensive induction treatment; sampling variability could account for resolution (n = 3) or reduction (n = 1) of BM involvement, but improvement in other markers also occurred. Antineuroblastoma effects were also evident in five of five children with asymptomatic relapses after a long chemotherapy-free interval: BM disease resolved and all other disease markers significantly improved in two patients, and disease markers improved or stabilized in three patients on treatment for more than 6 months. In these nine patients, extramedullary toxicity was absent, neutropenia did not occur, transfusional support was not needed, and preliminary data suggested little immunosuppression (phytohemagglutinin responses). Oral etoposide was ineffective in all (11 of 11) patients with rapidly growing tumor masses. CONCLUSION: Given the absence of toxicity to major organs, the minimal myelosuppression or immunosuppression, and the antineoplastic activity in patients with low tumor burdens after high-dose chemotherapy, limited use of low-dose oral etoposide should be considered for inclusion in postinduction consolidative treatment programs aimed at eradicating minimal residual disease.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II study of 21 day schedule oral etoposide in childrenEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Consolidation chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation versus continued chemotherapy for metastatic neuroblastoma: a report of two concurrent Children's Cancer Group studies.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Phase I trial of 13-cis-retinoic acid in children with neuroblastoma following bone marrow transplantation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Etoposide: Twenty years laterAnnals of Oncology, 1995
- Phase I study of oral etoposide in children with refractory solid tumors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- Impact of megatherapy on survival after relapse from stage 4 neuroblastoma in patients over 1 year of age at diagnosis: a report from the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Recurrent brainstem gliomas treated with oral VP-16Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 1993
- Chemotherapy dose intensity correlates strongly with response, median survival, and median progression-free survival in metastatic neuroblastoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991