Should a Two-and-a-Half Law Replace the Cube Law in British Elections?
- 1 July 1979
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 9 (3) , 355-362
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400001824
Abstract
For decades political scientists have been fascinated with the problem of establishing a formal mathematical relationship between the popular votes cast for a political party and the number of parliamentary seats it holds. The most famous attempt at solving this problem, known as the ‘cube law’, was formulated more than sixty years ago by James Parker Smith. Since then a large number of papers in support of the cube law have been published. Perhaps the most cited paper is by Kendall and Stuart. The cube law also has been stated to apply to parliamentary elections in New Zealand, the United States and Canada. But doubts about the cube law have also been expressed by Brookes, Eldersveld and just a few years ago by Tufte.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seats and votes: A generalization of the cube law of electionsSocial Science Research, 1973
- The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- The Desired Political EntropyAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- Seats and Votes: An Application of the Cube Law to the Canadian Electoral SystemCanadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 1968
- Legislative Representation and Party Vote in New Zealand: Reflections on the March AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1959
- Party Legislative Representation as a Function of Election ResultsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1957
- The Law of the Cubic Proportion in Election ResultsBritish Journal of Sociology, 1950