Which guidelines can we trust?

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:

• Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal
  The Lancet, 2000
• The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
  JAMA, 1999
• Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
• North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development
  BMJ, 1996
• Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions
  International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
• Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
  JAMA, 1995
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
  JAMA, 1995
• An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1990
• Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: Analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations A report by the Canadian task force on the periodic health examination
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
• Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials
  The American Journal of Medicine, 1982