Estrogen-Independent Proliferation Is Present in Estrogen-ReceptorHER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Letrozole
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- breast cancer
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (19) , 3019-3025
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.3034
Abstract
To investigate the impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1 and HER2 gene amplification on endocrine therapy responsiveness, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study was conducted on tumor samples from 305 postmenopausal patients with stage II and III estrogen receptor (ER) –positive (ER ≥ 10%) breast cancers treated on two independent neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials. FISH analysis focused on HER1 and/or HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) -positive patients and a random selection of HER1/2 IHC-negative patients. HER2 FISH status was correlated with response and changes in the proliferation marker Ki67. HER1 was rarely amplified (< 1%), and HER2 amplification was observed in 9.2% of patients. Letrozole response by clinical measurement (71% HER2 FISH positive v 71% HER2 FISH negative), mammogram (44% HER2 FISH positive v 47% HER2 FISH negative), or ultrasound (47% HER2 FISH positive v 54% HER2 FISH negative) was not impaired by HER2 FISH-positive status. In contrast, HER2 FISH-positive tumors showed higher histologic grade (P = .009), higher pretreatment Ki67 (P = .005), and less Ki67 suppression after letrozole when compared with HER2 FISH-negative tumors (P = .0001). Similar observations regarding Ki67 were made in a smaller cohort of tamoxifen-treated tumors. Neoadjuvant letrozole is clinically effective in ER-positive HER2 FISH-positive tumors, indicating sensitivity to short-term estrogen deprivation. However, continued proliferation despite ongoing letrozole or tamoxifen treatment in the majority of ER-positive HER2 FISH-positive samples (88%) could imply therapeutic resistance that may manifest later in the clinical course of the disease. Discordance between clinical and biomarker findings in this study serves to emphasize the need for surrogate end point validation in neoadjuvant endocrine trials through correlation with information on long-term outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neoadjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer With Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Both in Combination: The Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined With Tamoxifen (IMPACT) Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Clinical and biomarker endpoint analysis in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trialsThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2005
- Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT TrialistsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Correlation of HER-2 Status With Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors and Histologic Features in 3,655 Invasive Breast CarcinomasAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2005
- Signal transduction pathways in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cell proliferationEndocrine-Related Cancer, 2005
- Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic TherapyScience, 2005
- Role of endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant surgical settingAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2004
- Aberrant expression of minichromosome maintenance proteins 2 and 5, and Ki-67 in dysplastic squamous oesophageal epithelium and Barrett's mucosaGut, 2002
- Does c-erbB2/HER2 overexpression predict adjuvant tamoxifen failure in patients with early breast cancer?European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Long-term follow-up of elderly patients with locoregional breast cancer treated with tamoxifen onlyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991