War-Moods: I
- 1 September 1948
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 13 (3) , 147-174
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289258
Abstract
A person can be openly friendly, or hostile, or war-weary. Depth-psychology has shown that the underlying mood is also important. In the present theory the independent variable is time, and the dependent variables are the numbers of persons in different warmoods in two opposing nations. The rate of conversion of persons from one mood to another is taken to be proportional both to the number of susceptible persons and to the number of influencing persons, as in Kermack and McKendrick's theory of epidemics of cholera (15). This formulation leads to a set of differential equations nearly but not quite like those whereby Volterra (41) described the interaction between predator and prey among fish. Here the constants are fitted to the history of the First World War. The gregarious motive to follow a fashion of either peace or war is formulated as an amendment.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peace, war and culture-patternsBulletin of the John Rylands Library, 1948
- Peace, war and culture-patterns.1948
- The Number of Nations on Each Side of a WarJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1946
- The behaviour of an osglim lamp - III—Osglims in parallel, forming models of reciprocal inhibitionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1937
- The ignition of explosive gasesProceedings of the Physical Society, 1936
- The Solution of Sets of Simultaneous Integral Equations Related to the Equation of VolterraProceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 1936
- A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemicsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 1927
- Losses of Life Caused by WarThe Virginia Law Register, 1923
- The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1902