Toward Fewer Cesarean Sections — The Role of a Trial of Labor
- 5 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 335 (10) , 735-736
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609053351009
Abstract
The delivery of one of every four infants by cesarean section in the United States during the late 1980s and early 1990s aroused concern that many of these operations were unnecessary. Professional organizations established guidelines in an attempt to reduce the rate of cesarean section, with the goal being a rate of 15 percent for cesarean deliveries by the year 2000. Currently, one third of the cesarean sections performed are elective operations in women who have previously had cesarean sections, and the goal for the year 2000 is far from being achieved.1,2 If the high rate of cesarean delivery . . .Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean SectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: Success without mandated clinical changesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- A Clinical Trial of Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Cesarean birth: How to reduce the ratePublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Reducing the rate of cesarean deliveries. An obtainable but elusive goalJAMA, 1994
- Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Cesarean section delivery in the 1980's: International comparison by indicationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- A Controlled Trial of a Program for the Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992