Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 59 (3) , 193-197
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019547
Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions are increasingly being conducted to assist public policy decision making. Many intra-country initiatives have been established to conduct systematic reviews in their relevant public health areas. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organisation established to conduct and publish systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, is committed to high quality reviews that are regularly updated, published electronically, and meeting the needs of the consumers. Aims: To identify global priorities for Cochrane systematic reviews of public health topics. Methods: Systematic reviews of public health interventions were identified and mapped against global health risks. Global health organisations were engaged and nominated policy-urgent titles, evidence based selection criteria were applied to set priorities. Results: 26 priority systematic review titles were identified, addressing interventions such as community building activities, pre-natal and early infancy psychosocial outcomes, and improving the nutrition status of refugee and displaced populations. Discussion: The 26 priority titles provide an opportunity for potential reviewers and indeed, the Cochrane Collaboration as a whole, to address the previously unmet needs of global health policy and research agencies.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Globalisation and the prevention and control of non-communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adultsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- On Being a Good Listener: Setting Priorities for Applied Health Services ResearchThe Milbank Quarterly, 2003
- Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptionsBMJ, 2001
- How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision MakingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Developing Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Lessons Learned by the US Preventive Services Task ForceAnnual Review of Public Health, 1996