Reduction in Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction by Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier After Intestinal Resection
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 49 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0268-5
Abstract
Although Seprafilm has been demonstrated to reduce adhesion formation, it is not known whether its usage would translate into a reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction. This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, single-blind, controlled study. This report focuses on those patients who underwent intestinal resection (n = 1,701). Before closure of the abdomen, patients were randomized to receive Seprafilm or no treatment. Seprafilm was applied to adhesiogenic tissues throughout the abdomen. The incidence and type of bowel obstruction was compared between the two groups. Time to first adhesive small-bowel obstruction was compared during the course of the study by using survival analysis methods. The mean follow-up time for the occurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction was 3.5 years. There was no difference between the treatment and control group in overall rate of bowel obstruction. The incidence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation was significantly lower for Seprafilm patients compared with no-treatment patients: 1.8 vs. 3.4 percent (P < 0.05). This finding represents an absolute reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation of 1.6 percent and a relative reduction of 47 percent. In addition, a stepwise multivariate analysis indicated that the use of Seprafilm was the only predictive factor for reducing adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation. In both groups, 50 percent of first adhesive small-bowel obstruction episodes occurred within 6 months after the initial surgery with nearly 30 percent occurring within the first 30 days. Additionally no first adhesive small-bowel obstruction events were reported in Years 4 and 5 of follow-up. The overall bowel obstruction rate was unchanged; however, adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring reoperation was significantly reduced by the use of Seprafilm, which was the only factor that predicted this outcome.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical studyPublished by Elsevier ,2016
- A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Study of the Safety of Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier in Abdominopelvic Surgery of the IntestineDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2003
- Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesionsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Fewer Intraperitoneal Adhesions With Use of Hyaluronic Acid–Carboxymethylcellulose MembraneAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Postoperative adhesionsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 1999
- Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
- Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective reviewBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- IIeal Pouch-Anal Anastomoses Complications and Function in 1005 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1973