Comparative effects of carvedilol and amiodarone on conversion and recurrence rates of persistent atrial fibrillation
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 94 (5) , 659-662
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.05.037
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of effectiveness of carvedilol versus bisoprolol for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Pharmacological prevention of atrial tachycardia induced atrial remodeling as a potential therapeutic strategy.Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- Effects of Amiodarone and Diltiazem on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Conversion and Recurrence Rates: A Randomized Controlled StudyCardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2003
- Maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Sotalol vs bisoprololPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Use of metoprolol CR/XL to maintain sinus rhythm after conversion from persistent atrial fibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Amiodarone as a First-Choice Drug for Restoring Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial FibrillationChest, 2000
- Oral amiodarone increases the efficacy of direct-current cardioversion in restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillationEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- An open label, randomised, crossover study comparing sotalol and atenolol in the treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillationHeart, 1999
- Atrial electrophysiological remodeling caused by rapid atrial activation: underlying mechanisms and clinical relevance to atrial fibrillationCardiovascular Research, 1999
- Amiodarone in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Asymptomatic Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995